|
|
1. Topic-
|
| Cost Estimating a Production Run in a Machine Shop |
| |
|
2. Content-
|
| Students are given a blueprint and a sample part and need to estimate
cost per piece on a production run of 100 parts with a breakdown of
all expenses. |
| |
|
3. Goals: Aims/Outcomes-
|
1.improve time estimation
2.gain insight on tool/material cost
3.apply fixturing concepts into a complete fixture design.
4. develop a process plan |
| |
|
|
4. Objectives-
|
1.work in a team environment
2.colaborate ideas
3.complete task in a two hour class period |
| |
|
5. Materials and Aids-
|
Text book
Internet/computer |
| |
|
6. Procedures/Methods-
|
|
A. Introduction-
1.introduce blueprint
2.give students time to evaluate print
3.form student groups ( mock machine shop) |
| |
|
|
B. Development-
1.review print for a different part
2.key points for production
3.cost of production
4.time required for production |
| |
|
|
C. Practice-
1.students work through scenario with instructor as a class to estimate
cost on a similar part
2.questions and discussion afterwards
3.students are placed in their groups |
| |
|
|
D. Independent Practice-
1.students estimate time for simple machine operations
2.actual time is compared to students estimated time
3.questions and discussion afterwards |
| |
|
|
E. Accommodations (Differentiated Instruction)-
1.video on production management to show to class
2.power point presentation at class beginning
3.prior reading assignment |
| |
|
|
F. Checking for understanding-
1.student groups present their project to the class
2.students discuss presentation and question without instructor feedback
|
| |
|
|
G. Closure-
1.instructor portrays the position of a customer and decides which
"shop" he will award the job to.
2.explanation from the instructor as to why and how his decision was
made |
| |
|
7. Evaluation-
|
1.learner feedback forms
2.quiz |
| |
|
8. Teacher Reflection-
|
did the students engage in this activity?
is their knowledge improved in procurment?
This lesson plan was designed to improve student engagement and generate
some enthusiasm towards a subject that historically has been a little
boring for both students and instructor. This activity was fun and
interactive and the quiz scores were above average for all students. |
| |
|