|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Appearance
|
No sculptures have
good quality. Colors cannot be recognized or have no
color. Sculptures cannot be identified even after much
explanation.
|
Only 1-2 sculptures
have good quality. Colors are difficult to identify.
Sculptures can be recognized with detailed explanation.
|
Some candy has good
quality but others lack. Colors faded or diluted but
recognizable. Sculpture can be identified after little
explanation. is given.
|
Candy quality is well
done (see quality sheet). Colors are vibrant and easily
identified. Sculpture is easily recognizable with no
explanation.
|
____
|
|
Taste (when functionally
edible and recently made)
|
No flavor was added
or cannot be tasted.
|
Flavor is not strong
and does not make sense with sculpture or color.
|
Flavor is not strong
enough but makes sense with the sculpture and color
|
Taste is strong and
makes sense with sculpture. Color and flavor coordinate.
|
____
|
|
Technique
|
Technique used and
technique stated are not the same
|
Not all techniques
are used and cannot be recognized
|
All techniques are
used but cannot be recognized without some explanation
or do not make sense with sculpture
|
All techniques stated
(see technique sheet) are used, easily recognizable,
and look good with sculpture.
|
____
|
|
Research
|
No sources
|
1-2 websites
|
3-4 different sources
|
5 or more different
sources
|
____
|
|
Presentation
|
Bad posture and no
eye contact.
|
Good posture and eye
contact occasionally. Did not dress nice. (sweatpants,
T-shirt, bad hair, etc.)
|
Good posture throughout
presentation. Made eye contact. Not dressed nicely (jeans,
sweatshirt, T-shirt, etc.)
|
Good posture throughout
presentation. Made eye contact with everyone in the
audience. Dressed nicely.
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|