|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
Complexity of Design. How well do you interpret the artwork you are working from?
|
Simple design, no risk
|
Slightly complex, some evidence of "thinking outside the box"
|
Complex design, interprets the artwork in and interesting and original way
|
Very complex design, high level of risk involved, interprets artwork in a highly original way
|
____
|
Craftsmanship: How well is the object made? Refers specifically to the construction of the bowl.
|
Unacceptable appearance, didn't spend any time refining bowl on or off Potter's Wheel.
|
Unrefined appearance, trimmed bowl poorly, areas of cracking or chips in bowl.
|
Refined appearance, few imperfections, less than two areas of unintended blemishes.
|
Seamless appearance. Free of flaws. Spent a lot of time devoted to refining bowl.
|
____
|
Glazing: The glaze was applied in an appropriate manner and color in regard to the artwork.
|
Poor technique, more
than eight areas of unintended brush strokes apparent,
unglazed areas, sloppy. Colors to not reflect artwork.
|
Acceptable technique with four to seven areas of unintended brush strokes. Colors are similar but could be better.
|
Accomplished technique with less than three areas of unintended brush strokes. Colors match the artwork and appearance is refined.
|
Seamless glazing techniques. No more than one area of unintended brush strokes. Colors match artwork and mastery of technique is apparent.
|
____
|
Completion of project. Completes work within the stated time frame. Makes good use of class time.
|
Incomplete project. The project was not finished within the class periods.
|
Project complete but evidence that it was rushed are apparent. Glazing completed hastily.
|
Project complete, piece has been glaze fired and shows little evidence of rushed work.
|
Completed project, all done in timely manner, quality of this apparent in mastery level of work.
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|