|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Completeness
|
Only events explicitly
stated in the notes and evidence are included on the
time line. No conclusions are made.
|
Events on the time
line include those outlined in the notes and evidence,
as well as one or two events prior or after what was
provided. Overall conclusion is not supported by data.
|
Events on the time
line include those outlined in the notes and evidence,
plus at least 2 more prior to the actual heist and 2
after. Conclusion is minimally supported by evidence.
|
Events on the time
line include those outlined in the notes and evidence,
plus more than 2 prior to the heist and more than 2
after the heist. Conclusions are well supported by the
data.
|
____
|
|
Accuracy
|
No suspects are identified.
|
Identifies one or more
suspects responsible but is incorrect in the identification.
|
Correctly identifies
one or more suspect but does not identify all of them
or can not tell why certain people were responsible
(accessories to the crime).
|
Correctly identifies
all people responsible and their specific roles in the
heist.
|
____
|
|
Appearance
|
Presentation of the
time line is sloppy, does not adhere to the Essential
Agreement, not thought out, and/or difficult to read.
|
Presentation of time
line is neatly put together, does not adhere to the
Essential Agreement, not thought out, and/or difficult
to read.
|
Presentation of time
line is neatly put together, adheres to the Essential
Agreement, but lacks planning.
|
Presentation of time
line is neatly put together, adheres to the Essential
Agreement, is well planned, and is easy to understand.
|
____
|
|
Group Cooperation
- individual portion of the grade
|
One of the two partners
completed all the work by him/herself while the other
did nothing.
|
One of the two partners
completed the majority of the work by him/herself while
the other did minimal work throughout the project.
|
Both partners shared
in the responsibility of creating the time line, but
one of the partners did slightly more than the other.
|
Both partners contributed
equally to the project.
|
____
|
|
Paperwork - Suspect
Chart, Crime Logs (3 days worth), Hypotheses
|
More than one of the
pieces of paperwork is missing.
|
More than one of the
pieces of paperwork is incomplete OR data was simply
copied from the data/evidence onto the crime logs.
|
The majority of the
paperwork is complete, put into the students' own words,
and turned in.
|
All pieces of paperwork
are complete,put into the students' own words and turned
in.
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|