Investigating Careers
Name: ___________________ Teacher:
Date : ___________________ Title of Work: ___________________
 
Criteria
Points
1
2
3
4
 
Students are able to demonstrate a mastery of economic concepts
Frequent misuse of economic terminology
Several mistakes in using economic terms. Conceptual knowledge of economics is not demonstrated
Few mistakes in economic terminology. Concepts are supported by career descriptions
Mastery demonstrated by using economic terminology accurately and appropriately. Specific terms are used in detail. Concepts are exemplified in describing their career.
____
Accuracy and detail of Career
Career responsibilities, skills, income, etc., are grossly exaggerated or missing. No citations
Career description is missing several elements. Information is questionable and sometimes inaccurate
The needed details of career description are present, few if any citation mistakes.
Career description is detailed, proven with evidence and cited correctly
____
Reflects thought and Effort
Little thought or effort went into the organization and information contained in the report. Frequent grammar/spelling errors. Descriptions are shallow or unrealistic
Evaluation is biased and skewed toward career approval. Unorganized with frequent grammar errors.
Information/facts and facts that are assumed are sometimes unclear. Evaluation of career is fair
A significant amount of time is spent on project. This is shown by the insightfulness and impartiality of career investigation
____
____
____
       
Total---->
____

Teacher Comments:

 


This rubric is from www.TeacherJet.com