|
Experimental Design Chart
|
The proposed experiment is not relevant to the advertisement. Several ingredients of "what makes a good experiment" of the experiment are missing.
|
The proposed experiment is somewhat relevant to the advertisement. There are one or two ingredients of "what makes a good experiment" of the experiment are missing.
|
The proposed experiment
is relevant to the advertisement. All ingredients of
a good experiment are present, but some may be unclear
or not meeting the minimum standard.
|
The proposed experiment
is very relevant to the advertisement. The hypothesis
is clear and appropriate. There is a well defined control
group, clearly laid out constants, and a minimum of
three different independent variable groups.
|
____
|
|
Procedure steps
|
Procedure is not clear
and does not have any details that would indicate how
the experiment might run.
|
Procedure may be slightly
confusing and is missing several details that would
indicate how the experiment would run. A scientist would
have to ask the experiment designer many questions to
run the experiment
|
Procedure is mostly
clearly laid out but missing a few specific details.
A scientist would have to ask the experiment designer
questions to run the experiment
|
Procedure is clearly
laid out with exact times, measurements, number of participants,
etc. In an ideal world scientist could take this procedure
and run the experiment today.
|
____
|