|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Choice of Article
- was the main heading of the review clearly describes the article.
|
There is no relevance between the article and the given heading of the review.
|
A better heading of the review could have been given.
|
Heading of the review is good and describes the article well.
|
Heading of the review is excellent and clearly describes the article well.
|
____
|
|
overview or brief description of the article.
|
Just copied the objectives from the article without any parapahrase.
|
Some parts of the objectives was copied, there where some paraphrase of ideas.
|
Objectives was stated well, few ideas copied but attempt to paraphrase is seen.
|
Objectives was stated well,proper paraphrasing of ideas is done.
|
____
|
|
Critique of the article
|
Did not follow guidelines for article critique.
No effort was made to critically evaluate the article.
|
Followed the outline for article critique.
Most of the explanation or critique was copied directly from the article.
|
Followed the outline for article critique critique.
Some explanations or critique was copied from the article but paraphrases was done.
|
Followed the outline for article critique.
Explanations and critique was stated in proper paraphrase. Comments and ideas where thought of.
|
____
|
|
properly followed the format
submitted the critique article on time.
Good grammar.
|
Did not follow proper format.
late submission of critique article.
A lot of grammar correction.
|
Did not follow proper format.
Submission of critique article was on time.
With grammar correction.
|
Followed the proper format.
Submission of cque article was on time.
Less grammar correction.
|
Followed the proper format.
Submission of critique article was on time.
Grammar is good.
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|