|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Lead
|
The lead was dull and did not pull reader into the piece. The lead was difficult to identify and was ineffective.
|
The lead was easy to identify, but did lack focus. The lead did not grab reader's attention and was ineffective.
|
The lead was focused and easy to identify. The lead was effective and served its purpose.
|
The lead grabbed the reader's attention and pulled him/her into the piece. The lead was powerful, memorable and extremely effective.
|
____
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Summary was not present in the review.
|
Summary was a simple list of events/facts from the book. Summary did not leave reader with any questions or interest in reading the book.
|
Summary was able to briefly describe the major events from the book.
|
Summary was short and to the point. The summary piqued the reader' interest and made the reader want to check out the book.
|
____
|
|
Evaluation/Critique
|
Evaluation of the book was not present in the piece.
|
Evaluation was short and did not use specific examples and details from the book. Questions were not answered in this section of the review. A recommendation was not given.
|
Evaluation provided some examples and details from the book. Some questions were answered, but not enough to pique reader's interest. A recommendation was given with support.
|
Evaluation/critique used specific details from the book and was focused. Specific questions were answered and examples from the book were used effectively. A recommendation was given with strong support.
|
____
|
|
Conventions
|
The conclusion was not present. The paper just ended!
|
Conclusion was present, but lacked focus.
|
The conclusion was focused and easy to identify. The conclusion was effective and served its purpose.
|
The conclusion left the reader wanting more from the book. It discussed the author's purpose and ended with a strong statement about the book.
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|