Red Robin
Name: ___________________ Teacher:
Date : ___________________ Title of Work: ___________________
 
Criteria
Points
1
2
3
4
 
Student has a strong, clearly stated thesis.
There is not thesis or thesis does not agree with body.
Thesis is not clearly stated.
Thesis is clearly stated but is not thoroughly backed up.
Thesis is clearly stated and supported.
____
How well does the paper stick to the topic: What makes Red Robin so "yummm?"
Student often digresses about Burger King instead.
Red Robin is often talked about but the "yummm" factor is mostly unseen.
Student mostly talks about Red Robin and its "yummm."
Student adheres well to Red Robin and its "yummm."
____
Topic is explained well.
Student has never eaten at Red Robin before and therefor cannot explain its "yummm."
Student expresses some knowledge of what a Red Robin burger tastes like.
Student understands the "yummm."
Student understands the "yummm" and explains it well.
____
Few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors occur.
Student couldn't tell the difference between "their", "there" and "they're" if their dictionary was right there in front of them.
Quite a few errors were made.
Only a couple errors were made.
Paper had no errors.
____
How well does the conclusion sum up the paper.
There is no conclusion or it was copied and pasted from a paper about squirrels.
The conclusion does not adequately sum up the paper.
The conclusion is there is missing that little something.
The conclusion clearly sums up the paper.
____
       
Total---->
____

Teacher Comments:

 


This rubric is from www.TeacherJet.com