|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Knowledge and Understanding(R1.8)
*make judgments and draw conclusions about ideas in
texts and cite stated or implied evidence from the text
to support their views
|
*makes judgments and
draws conclusions about ideas in texts and cite stated
or implied evidence from the text to support their views
with limited effectiveness
|
*makes judgments and
draws conclusions about ideas in texts and cite stated
or implied evidence from the text to support their views
with some effectiveness
|
*Effectively makes
judgments and draws conclusions about ideas in texts
and cite stated or implied evidence from the text to
support their views
|
*makes judgments and
draws conclusions about ideas in texts and cite stated
or implied evidence from the text to support their views
with considerable effectiveness
|
____
|
|
Thinking (W1.5)
*identify and order main ideas in a multi-paragraphed
piece of writing
|
identifies and orders
main ideas in a multi-paragraphed piece of writing with
limited effectiveness
|
*identifies and orders
main ideas in a multi-paragraphed piece of writing with
some effectiveness
|
*Effectively identifies
and orders main ideas in a multi-paragraphed piece of
writing
|
*identifies and orders
main ideas in a multi-paragraphed piece of writing with
a high degree of effectiveness
|
____
|
|
Communication (W2.2)
*establish a distinctive voice in their writing appropriate
to the subject and audience (W2.4) *create complex sentences
by combining phrases, clauses and/or simple sentences
|
*establishes a distinctive
voice in their writing appropriate to the subject and
audience with limited effectiveness *creates complex
sentences by combining phrases, clauses and/or simple
sentences with limited effectiveness
|
*establishes a distinctive
voice in their writing appropriate to the subject and
audience with limited effectiveness *creates complex
sentences by combining phrases, clauses and/or simple
sentences with limited effectiveness
|
*establishes a distinctive
voice in their writing appropriate to the subject and
audience with limited effectiveness *creates complex
sentences by combining phrases, clauses and/or simple
sentences with limited effectiveness
|
*establishes a distinctive
voice in their writing appropriate to the subject and
audience with limited effectiveness *creates complex
sentences by combining phrases, clauses and/or simple
sentences with limited effectiveness
|
____
|
|
Application *spells
familiar words correctly
|
*numerous spelling
errors
|
*some spelling errors
|
*few spelling errors
|
*no spelling errors
|
____
|
|
Content
|
Book review does not
meet expectations; there is no 'thumbs up/thumbs down'
verdict, questions are poorly chosen and poorly answered,
part of project is missing.
|
Project is complete
but questions are poorly done; opinions are elementary
and don't provide support.
|
Opinions, questions,
and verdict are all completed; they may be somewhat
elementary and do not provide adequate support from
novel.
|
Style is evident throughout,
and support from novel is used to justify written material.
|
____
|
|
Creativity
|
Project is not written
like a 'review'; it is poorly organized and incomplete.
|
Project authors clearly
researched reviews to model upon; plot summary, verdict,
and questions are complete but could have been more
creatively done.
|
Project authors researched
reviews and made unique and thought-provoking choices;
modeling of reviews is obvious. Questions and verdict
are very creative.
|
Authors clearly got
into 'character' in their writing by researching reviews
and studying verdicts. Questions were unique and creative,
and answers were natural.
|
____
|
|
Written Component
|
There is no accompanying
written component.
|
Accompanying written
component is poorly done and does not appear to be from
the perspective of a book reviewer.
|
Written component comes
from perspective of reviewer and adequately describes
plot and opinions.
|
Written component is
written from perspective of reviewer, is very specific
and uses detail from novel to support facts.
|
____
|
|
Mechanics
|
Project was handed
in very late, spelling and grammar are poor, project
is incomplete.
|
Project was on time,
but there are multiple spelling and grammar errors.
Project could have used more effort or time for completion.
|
Project was on time.
There are only a few spelling or grammar errors. Project
appears to be done to the best of the authors' abilities.
|
Project was handed
in early, or there are no spelling or grammar errors.
Project goes above and beyond expectations.
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|