|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
5 paragraph format,
using proper grammar and syntax.
|
There is little to
no (1-2 paragraphs) evidence of paragraph format. There
is no evidence of revision; multiple errors in grammar
and syntax.
|
There is some evidence
(2-3 paragraphs) of paragraph format, though intro and
conclusion are vague or not evident. There is some evidence
of revision; grammar and syntax are inconsistent.
|
There is good evidence
(4-5 paragraphs) of paragraph format. Work has clearly
been subject to revision; grammar and syntax do not
detract from an overall good effort.
|
Paragraph format is
excellent. The 5 paragraphs contain clear separation
of details; introduction and conclusion are concise
and informative. There are few errors in grammar or
syntax. Overall, and excellent job.
|
____
|
|
Choice and development
of topic.
|
The choice of topic
is clear, but the information is not supportive of the
topic. There are vague connections, if any, to the topic.
|
The choice of topic
is clear, and there is some evidence that information
supports the topic, but the writer struggles to connect
the ideas.
|
The choice is clear,
and the writer connects the ideas and research to the
topic. The research is sound, but does not go beyond
the regular scope of the topic.
|
The choice is clear,
and the writer connects the ideas well to the topic.
The writer broadens the scope of the information, including
information that is not readily apparent, and expands
the perspective of the topic.
|
____
|
|
Development of country
list and consequences of decisions.
|
The writer has difficulty
compiling a list of countries and cannot offer any information
regarding the consequences of their decision.
|
The writer offers a
small sample of the countries that are impacted by boycotting,
and makes vague, simple references to the consequences
of their decisions.
|
The writer satisfactorily
creates a list of affected countries, and provides compelling
evidence of the consequences of their actions.
|
The writer creates
a thorough list of countries impacted by boycotting,
and looks at more than one perspective regarding the
consequences of their actions. The writer provides informative
and compelling information that looks beyond the immediate
impact.
|
____
|
|
Drawing conclusions
|
The writer is not able
to draw any conclusions about the information.
|
There is little evidence
that the writer is able to connect to the material and
draw any conclusions.
|
The writer has provided
simple, but clear conclusions about the decisions made
by the boycotting countries.
|
The writer creates
a compelling argument for his/her decision. Their is
clear evidence of inferences, and the writer has developed
the material well.
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|