|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Definition of Terms
|
Terms were not clearly defined and did not add to the understanding of the poem.
|
Terms were somewhat understood and defined but clearly did not enhance the meaning of the poem.
|
Terms were well defined but lacks some understanding. They did not connect to the theme of the poem.
|
Terms chosen were defined clearly for the audience and there was full understanding of their use.
|
____
|
|
Explication
|
Line by line interpretation was unclear and confusing.
|
Line by line interpretation was attempted but showed little understanding.
|
Line by line interpretation was somewhat relevant but did not quite exemplify full understanding of the poem.
|
Line by line interpretation was clear, sensible, and exemplified full understanding for the audience.
|
____
|
|
Effort
|
It was clear that no effort was given when explicating the poem.
|
Some effort was clear but there were gaps in the understanding of the poem which proves more time spent was necessary.
|
Partial effort was evident due to some unclear explanations.
|
Full effort was given based on the thought-provoking statements given.
|
____
|
|
Theme of the Poem
|
The theme was not analyzed well and/or the explanation was not plausible.
|
The theme was somewhat attempted but lacks evidence.
|
The theme was explored well and educated guesses were made, however, it lacks substance.
|
The theme was discussed and analyzed thoroughly and the explanations were thoughtful for the audience.
|
____
|
|
Public Speaking
|
Volume and eye contact were low and non existent.
|
Volume and eye contact was attempted but not projected well.
|
Volume and eye contact was attempted well at times.
|
Volume and eye contact helped the audience connect with the speaker.
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|