|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Content: Project
makes appropriate references to content from "Killing
Mr. Griffin" and/or includes themes or examples from
chapters 11 through 20.
|
Project has no references
to "Killing Mr. Griffin
|
Project has fewer than
three specific examples; does not seem to reflect themes
from "Killing Mr. Griffin
|
Project holds three
to five examples; theme seems reflected but not explored.
|
Project has six or
more direct examples from the text; themes are discussed
and explored; student shows understanding of the content.
|
____
|
|
Neatness/Visual
Effect: Was the project neatly presented? Does it look
like a final draft?
|
Project is sloppy;
illegible
|
Project is barely legible;
very little effort present.
|
Project is satisfactory;
contains a few errors; appears to be a rough draft.
|
Project is neat, user-friendly,
and care was taken to put together a final piece.
|
____
|
|
Creativity: Is the
project well thought out?
|
No creativity expressed.
|
Some thought present,
but they seem to be unrelated to the material or very
elementary.
|
Creative ideas present
that could be further explored.
|
Creative ideas present
and thoroughly explored.
|
____
|
|
Presentation: Was
the student confident and clear in presentation? Did
they show knowledge in their project topic?
|
Student did not present.
|
Student presented.
Was not confident in delivery or it was hard to understand
them from an audience perspective. Were not able to
field any questions on their project.
|
Presentation was acceptable.
Student was able to field some questions and appropriately
deliver a presentation to the class.
|
Student was able to
hold class attention excellently. Answered any and all
questions relating to the project with skill and ease.
Clear and confident in speech.
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|