|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Where is the conflict
of interest in this continuing medical education (CME)
relationship?
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are not discussed
and not supported - Chapter terminology was not incorporated
into answer. (0 - 1) - Answer contains major grammar,
spelling, and formatting errors and lacks organization.
- There was no critical thinking or original ideas expressed.
- Answer was not complete – Length of answer was too
short to be adequately discussed. - Did not follow Instructions
(Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are slightly
clear, but not supported. - Very few chapter terms incorporated
into answer. (2 - 4) - Answer had many grammar, spelling,
and formatting errors. Answer lacks clarity. - The ideas
expressed demonstrate a low degree of originality and
critical thinking. - Question was not answered completely-
or answer was too short to be adequately discussed,
answer lacked clarity, etc.�� - Did not follow all of
the instructions (Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are stated clearly
but not supported. - Many chapter terms incorporated
into discussion. (5 - 7) - Answer contained few grammar,
spelling, or formatting errors. Still needs to work
on clarity. - The ideas expressed demonstrate some critical
thinking. - Answer was mostly complete – Language
is lacks clarity. - Followed most of the instructions
(Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are stated clearly
and well supported. - Excellent incorporation of chapter
terminology into discussion. (8+) - Answer is free of
grammar, spelling or formatting errors. Language is
clear and precise. - The ideas expressed in the answer
demonstrate a high degree of originality and critical
thinking. - Completely answered question. - Followed
all instructions.
|
____
|
|
If the pharmaceutical
company is paying for the vent, shouldn't it have the
right to promote its products at the event? Why or Why
not?
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are not discussed
and not supported - Chapter terminology was not incorporated
into answer. (0 - 1) - Answer contains major grammar,
spelling, and formatting errors and lacks organization.
- There was no critical thinking or original ideas expressed.
- Answer was not complete – Length of answer was too
short to be adequately discussed. - Did not follow Instructions
(Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are not discussed
and not supported - Chapter terminology was not incorporated
into answer. (0 - 1) - Answer contains major grammar,
spelling, and formatting errors and lacks organization.
- There was no critical thinking or original ideas expressed.
- Answer was not complete – Length of answer was too
short to be adequately discussed. - Did not follow Instructions
(Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are stated clearly
but not supported. - Many chapter terms incorporated
into discussion. (5 - 7) - Answer contained few grammar,
spelling, or formatting errors. Still needs to work
on clarity. - The ideas expressed demonstrate some critical
thinking. - Answer was mostly complete – Language
is lacks clarity. - Followed most of the instructions
(Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are stated clearly
and well supported. - Excellent incorporation of chapter
terminology into discussion. (8+) - Answer is free of
grammar, spelling or formatting errors. Language is
clear and precise. - The ideas expressed in the answer
demonstrate a high degree of originality and critical
thinking. - Completely answered question. - Followed
all instructions.
|
____
|
|
Pfizer stated in
2008 that it would only support medical education put
on by hospitals and professional medical associations.
How can it then justify the Stanford grant?
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are not discussed
and not supported - Chapter terminology was not incorporated
into answer. (0 - 1) - Answer contains major grammar,
spelling, and formatting errors and lacks organization.
- There was no critical thinking or original ideas expressed.
- Answer was not complete – Length of answer was too
short to be adequately discussed. - Did not follow Instructions
(Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are not discussed
and not supported - Chapter terminology was not incorporated
into answer. (0 - 1) - Answer contains major grammar,
spelling, and formatting errors and lacks organization.
- There was no critical thinking or original ideas expressed.
- Answer was not complete – Length of answer was too
short to be adequately discussed. - Did not follow Instructions
(Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are stated clearly
but not supported. - Many chapter terms incorporated
into discussion. (5 - 7) - Answer contained few grammar,
spelling, or formatting errors. Still needs to work
on clarity. - The ideas expressed demonstrate some critical
thinking. - Answer was mostly complete – Language
is lacks clarity. - Followed most of the instructions
(Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are stated clearly
and well supported. - Excellent incorporation of chapter
terminology into discussion. (8+) - Answer is free of
grammar, spelling or formatting errors. Language is
clear and precise. - The ideas expressed in the answer
demonstrate a high degree of originality and critical
thinking. - Completely answered question. - Followed
all instructions.
|
____
|
|
Propose an alternative
approach to ensure that CME is provided without a conflict
of interest.
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are not discussed
and not supported - Chapter terminology was not incorporated
into answer. (0 - 1) - Answer contains major grammar,
spelling, and formatting errors and lacks organization.
- There was no critical thinking or original ideas expressed.
- Answer was not complete – Length of answer was too
short to be adequately discussed. - Did not follow Instructions
(Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are not discussed
and not supported - Chapter terminology was not incorporated
into answer. (0 - 1) - Answer contains major grammar,
spelling, and formatting errors and lacks organization.
- There was no critical thinking or original ideas expressed.
- Answer was not complete – Length of answer was too
short to be adequately discussed. - Did not follow Instructions
(Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are stated clearly
but not supported. - Many chapter terms incorporated
into discussion. (5 - 7) - Answer contained few grammar,
spelling, or formatting errors. Still needs to work
on clarity. - The ideas expressed demonstrate some critical
thinking. - Answer was mostly complete – Language
is lacks clarity. - Followed most of the instructions
(Name, date, APA format, etc.)
|
- Essential points,
course/chapter concepts and/or theories are stated clearly
and well supported. - Excellent incorporation of chapter
terminology into discussion. (8+) - Answer is free of
grammar, spelling or formatting errors. Language is
clear and precise. - The ideas expressed in the answer
demonstrate a high degree of originality and critical
thinking. - Completely answered question. - Followed
all instructions.
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|
|
|