|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Visual Appeal
|
There are many errors
in spelling, grammar and punctuation. The slides were
difficult to read and too much information had been
copied onto them. No visual appeal.
|
There are many errors
in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information
was contained on many slides. Minimal effort made to
make slides appealing or too much going on.
|
There are some errors
in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Too much information
on two or more slides. Significant visual appeal.
|
There are no errors
in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Information is
clear and concise. Visually appealing/engaging.
|
____
|
|
Comprehension
|
Presenters didn't understand
topic. Majority of questions answered by only one member
or majority of information incorrect.
|
Few members showed
good understanding of some parts of topic. Only some
members accurately answered questions.
|
Most showed a good
understanding of topic. All members able to answer most
audience questions.
|
Extensive knowledge
of topic. Members showed complete understanding of assignment.
Accurately answered all questions posted.
|
____
|
|
Presentation Skills
|
Minimal eye contact
by more than one member focusing on a small part of
the audience. The audience was not engaged. Majority
of presenters spoke too quickly/quietly making it difficult
to understand. Inappropriate/disinterested body language.
|
Members focused on
only part of the audience. Sporadic eye contact by more
than one presenter. The audience was distracted. Speakers
could be heard by only half the audience. Body language
was distracting.
|
Most members spoke
to majority of audience; steady eye contact. The audience
was engaged by the presentation. Majority of presenters
spoke at a suitable volume. Some fidgeting by member(s).
|
Regular/constant eye
contact. The audience was engaged, and presenters held
the audience's attention. Appropriate speaking volume
and body language.
|
____
|
|
Content
|
The presentation adequately
touched on one of the four content criteria (explanation
of the disorder, a brief history, how the disorder is
identified and the techniques employed in treatment).
|
The presentation adequately
touched on two of the four listed content criteria (explanation
of the disorder, a brief history, how the disorder is
identified and the techniques employed in treatment).
|
The presentation adequately
touched on three of the four listed content criteria
(explanation of the disorder, a brief history, how the
disorder is identified and the techniques employed in
treatment).
|
The presentation adequately
touched on all the listed criteria (explanation of the
disorder, a brief history, how the disorder is identified
and the techniques employed in treatment).
|
____
|
|
Preparedness/Participation/
Group Dynamics
|
Unbalanced presentation
or tension resulting from over-helping. Multiple group
members not participating. Evident lack of preparation/rehearsal.
Dependence on slides.
|
Significant controlling
by some members with one minimally contributing. Primarily
prepared with some dependence on reading off slides.
|
Slight domination of
one presenter. Members helped each other. Very well
prepared.
|
All presenters knew
the information, participated equally, and helped each
other as needed. Extremely prepared and rehearsed.
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|