|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Cooperation: How well did you work together as a group? How did you contribute or hinder group cooperation?
|
No cooperation. Absence of all cooperation
or contact with group. Inhibited group's ability to
function. Highest level of noncooperation.
|
Low degree of cooperation. Paid very little
attention to group members, mostly working independently.
Multiple incidents of conflict and noncooperation in
the group.
|
Moderate degree of cooperation. Mostly listened and respected fellow classmates opinions and work. Minimal conflicts within the group.
|
High degree of cooperation between student
and group. Treated each member with respect and courtesy.
There were no unresolved issues or problems of noncooperation.
|
____
|
|
Roles: Did you perform your role to the best of your abilities?
|
Work was turned in late. Inhibited group success. Failed to accomplish more than half of role responsibilities.
|
Work was not completed in a timely manner. Inhibited group success. Failed to accomplish half of role responsibilities.
|
Work was completed on time. Was somewhat Important
to group success. Accomplished most tasks associated
with role.
|
Completed work on time. Played a vital role in group success. Accomplished all tasks associated with role.
|
____
|
|
Grammar/Citations: Is everything spelled correctly? Did you properly cite your sources? Did you fact check your information?
|
Work contained 5+ errors (misspellings, misinformation, absent citations).
|
Work contained 3-5 errors (misspellings, misinformation, absent citations).
|
Work contained 2-3 errors (misspellings, misinformation, absent citations).
|
Work was free of all errors (misspellings, misinformation, absent citations).
|
____
|
|
Final Product: Did you follow directions? Is the material presented in a fun and engaging manner?
|
Poor quality or work, missing interviews and/or script, multiple continuity issues, obvious lack of rehearsal. Did not represent more than one point of view on topic.
|
Low quality of work with multiple continuity issues, minimal evidence of rehearsal or the use of a script. 0-1 interview. Did not represent both sides of the argument.
|
Moderate quality of work with minimal continuity issues. Evidence of some rehearsal. 1-2 interviews. Somewhat entertaining and artistic and engaging. Presented a slightly slanted political viewpoint.
|
High quality of work with no continuity issues, well rehearsed dialogue and interviews. 2+ interviews. Fun, engaging and artistic. Presented both sides of the political issue and took a stand.
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|