|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
Title and Works Cited
|
No title was included. No work cited was included.
|
Title and/or work cited was included but was not relevant or complete.
|
Title was included and had some relevance. Work cited was present but improperly structured.
|
Title was included and was completely relevant. Work cited followed required format perfectly.
|
____
|
Introduction
|
Zero of these were included: Background information
The purpose of the investigaion
References
OR procedure is totally illogical.
|
One of these was included: Background information
The purpose of the investigaion
References
OR procedure is somewhat illogical.
|
Two of these were included: Background information
The purpose of the investigaion
References
OR procedure is slightly illogical.
|
All of these were included: Background information
The purpose of the investigaion
References
AND procedure is totally logical.
|
____
|
Hypothesis and Materials
|
Hypothesis was not included or not logical; materials were not included or were incorrect.
|
Hypothesis was somewhat logical; some materials were included.
|
Hypothesis is logical; most materials were included.
|
Hypothesis was entirely logical and well-thought out; all materials were included.
|
____
|
Procedure
|
Not written in paragraph form. Directions very unclear."I, we, you" used often. Expmt could never be recreated based on these directions. All of the class data were omitted.
|
Poorly written paragraphs. Directions unclear. "I, we, you" used somewhat often. Expmt could not be recreated well based on these directions. Some of the class data were included.
|
Paragraphs are comprehensible. Directions are clear. "I, we, you" used rarely. Expmt could probably be recreated based on these directions. All of the class data were included.
|
Paragraphs are well written. Directions are very clear and understandable. "I, we, you" never used. Expmt could definitely be recreated based on these directions. All of the class data were included.
|
____
|
Results and Discussion
|
Results: did not include graphs and charts. There were no explanations and/or no logical order.
Discussion: data results were not interpreted. The significance was not stated. Error factors were not discussed. Additional research was not suggested.
|
Results: did not include all graphs and charts. There were no explanations and/or no logical order. Graphs/charts mislabeled.
Discussion: data results were not well interpreted. The significance was not well stated. Error factors were not discussed efectively. Additional research was not suggested or was not logical.
|
Results: include all graphs and charts, labels not all correct. There were explanations and/or a logical order.
Discussion: data results were interpreted effectively. The significance was stated. Error factors were discussed somewhat effectively. Additional research was suggested or was logical.
|
Results: included detailed graphs and charts with all labels correct. There were clear & concise explanations tha followed a logical order.
Discussion: data results were thoroughly interpreted and clearly presented. The significance was clearly stated. Error factors were logical and well thought out. Additional research was logical and well thought out.
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|