|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Classification of organisms
|
-No visual representation of organisms
-Identified no organisms
-Did not state species' name
|
-Visual representation of 1 organism(s)
-No color used
-Identified 3 organisms or less
-Stated species wrong name
-Same type of species listed
|
-Visual representation of 2 or less organisms
-Used color of organisms
-Identified at least four organisms
-Stated most or species' correct names
-Listed at least two types of organisms
|
-Visual representation of 3 or more organisms
-Used proper color of organisms
-Identified five or more organisms
-Stated species' names
-Listed a variety of types organisms
|
____
|
|
Identification of Relationships
|
-No relationships between organisms identified
-No relationships between organisms and ecosystem identified
-No science terminology used
|
-Identified one relationship between organisms
-Identified one relationship between organisms and environment
-No scientific terminology used
|
-Listed multiple relationships between organisms that was seen
-Listed multiple relationships between organisms and environment that was seen
-Mixed up scientific names for relationships
-No possible relationships listed
|
-Listed multiple relationships between organisms
-Listed multiple relationships between organisms and environment
-Included possible relationships based on observations
-Used scientific terms to identify relationships
|
____
|
|
Identification of Ecosystem
|
-No aspects of an ecosystem listed
-Demonstrated no understanding of the definition of an ecosystem
-Did not state whether the woods was or was not an ecosystem
|
-Listed the composition of ecosystem with only one type of aspect
-Demonstrated little understanding of the definition of an ecosystem
-Stated whether or not the woods was an ecosystem
-No evidence
|
-Listed composition of ecosystem with living and nonliving aspects
-Demonstrated some understanding of the definition of an ecosystem
-Stated opinion of whether or not the woods was an ecosystem
-Inaccurate evidence
|
-Listed composition of ecosystem with living and nonliving aspects
-Demonstrated full understanding of the definition of an ecosystem
-Stated their opinion of whether the woods was or was not an ecosystem
-Supported decision with evidence
|
____
|
|
Used Data Effectively
|
-No reasons why the forest was an ecosystem
-No examples to support the decision
-No evidence listed
|
-Had one finding from the investigation on why or why not the forest was an ecosystem
-No specific examples
-Evidence was inaccurate
-No factors were listed
|
-Incorporated findings from investigation in the evidence of whether or not the forest was an ecosystem
-Had at least one specific example from observation to support decision
-Evidence was mostly accurate
-Some factors were listed to decide whether or not the forest was an ecosystem
|
-Incorporated findings from investigation in evidence of whether or not the forest was an ecosystem
-Had at least two specific examples from observation to support decision
-Accurate evidence
-Variety of factors influenced the decision of an ecosystem
|
____
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____
|
| |
|
|
|
Total---->
|
____
|