|
Identification of Values
|
No discussion of values or discussion is inappropriate and off task.
|
Limited discussion of values. Unclear understanding of value and its meaning.
|
Good discussion of one or more values. Appropriately used in context.
|
Outstanding, clear discussion of one or more values. Values used in appropriate context.
|
____
|
|
Support (Argument for value chosen)
|
No explanation given to support why value was chosen. Lack of details or evidence.
|
Some explanation given to support why value was chosen. Some details and evidence provided.
|
Good explanation given to support why value was chosen. Use of details and evidence.
|
Clear explanation given to support why value was chosen. Strong use of details and evidence.
|
____
|
|
Predictions (How will value affect future of society?)
|
Lack of prediction. Shows no connection between preamble and drafting of constitution and creation of government.evidence of understanding the
|
Good prediction. Shows evidence of some understanding of connection between preamble and drafting of constitution and creation of government.
|
Adequate prediction. Shows evidence of good understanding of connection between preamble and drafting of constitution and creation of government.
|
Strong prediction. Shows evidence of clear understanding of connection between preamble and drafting of constitution and creation of government.
|
____
|
|
Mechanics (Spelling, Grammar, Organization)
|
Poor use of mechanics. More than 5 spelling errors, poor grammar and organization hinder readability of piece.
|
Some errors in mechanics. 3-4 spelling errors, grammar and organization occasionally unclear.
|
Few errors in mechanics. 1-2 spelling errors, good grammar and organization. Piece is easily read and understood.
|
No errors in mechanics. Spelling, grammar, and organization are excellent. Readability is outstanding.
|
____
|